What is the main allegation made by the farmer in Lliuya v. RWE?

Prepare for the GARP Sustainability and Climate Risk Exam. Study with flashcards and multiple choice questions, each question includes hints and explanations. Gear up for success with our materials!

The central allegation made by the farmer in the case of Lliuya v. RWE is that RWE's emissions have contributed to climate change effects, specifically the melting of glaciers, which in turn has increased the risk of flooding in his region. This case is significant as it represents one of the first instances where an individual has sought to hold a major corporation legally accountable for environmental damages linked to climate change caused by its operations. The farmer argues that the emissions from RWE, a major utility company in Germany, have a direct impact on the hazards he faces due to climate change, underscoring the broader implications of corporate responsibility for greenhouse gas emissions. This legal action highlights the intersection of climate science and accountability, focusing on the tangible impacts that climate change has on local communities.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy