How do adaptation strategies differ from mitigation strategies in climate risk management?

Mitigation strategies are focused on reducing the sources of greenhouse gas emissions and minimizing the severity of climate change. This often involves adopting measures such as transitioning to renewable energy sources, increasing energy efficiency, and enhancing carbon capture technologies. The primary goal of mitigation is to address the root causes of climate change, aiming for a long-term reduction in climate-related risks.

In contrast, adaptation strategies are geared toward adjusting to the already occurring impacts of climate change. They focus on making changes to social, economic, and environmental systems to lessen the harm caused by climate impacts, such as rising sea levels, extreme weather events, and temperature changes. This may involve constructing flood defenses, modifying agricultural practices, or improving water management systems.

The distinction is important because while mitigation seeks to limit the extent of climate change, adaptation is about coping with the changes that are already happening or are inevitable. Therefore, understanding these differences is crucial for effective climate risk management, as both strategies are necessary to build resilience against climate threats.

The other choices do not accurately capture the core aspects of mitigation and adaptation. For instance, adaptation does not focus solely on economic growth nor does it only involve investing in new technologies; it encompasses a broader array of strategies to manage climate risks. The option that identifies